Vitalidade pulpar em lesões de cárie profundas após restaurações pelo Tratamento Restaurador Atraumático (ART) em molares decíduos: resultado após 24 meses de um ensaio clínico randomizado / Pulp vitality in deep carious lesions after Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) restorations in primary molars: 24 months results of a randomized clinical trial

O objetivo desta tese foi avaliar a vitalidade pulpar de dentes decíduos com lesão de cárie profunda tratados com duas técnicas restauradoras. A taxa de sobrevivência da restauração foi avaliada como um desfecho secundário. Este volume apresenta um compilado do protocolo de pesquisa e os resultados de ensaio clínico randomizado (Clinicaltrials.gov registration NCT02903979) de não inferioridade com dois braços paralelos relatados pelas recomendações SPIRIT e CONSORT, respectivamente. Crianças de 4 a 8 anos com pelo menos uma lesão cariosa profunda oclusal ou ocluso-proximal em molares decíduos foram selecionadas na clínica odontológica da Universidade Ibirapuera. Cento e oito molares decíduos foram alocados em dois grupos: (1) restauração com cimento de hidróxido de cálcio seguido do cimento de ionômero de vidro de alta viscosidade (CHC + HVGIC) ou (2) restauração com HVGIC. A vitalidade pulpar e a sobrevivência da restauração foram avaliadas em 6, 12 e 24 meses. A análise por intenção de tratar foi usada para a vitalidade pulpar e a análise de sobrevida foi realizada com o método de Kaplan-Meier ( = 5%). Aos 24 meses, 86 restaurações foram avaliadas e 91 foram avaliadas pelo menos uma vez durante o estudo. A perda foi de 20%, e o número de participantes no início e no final do estudo foi semelhante entre os grupos (p = 0,872). Não houve diferença significativa entre os tratamentos restauradores em relação à vitalidade pulpar (CHC + HVGIC = 70% e HVGIC = 68,5%) (OR = 1,09; IC95% = 0,48-2,48). No entanto, as restaurações HVGIC (73%) apresentaram uma taxa de sobrevivência maior do que CHC + HVGIC (50%) (p = 0,021). Na análise de regressão de Cox apenas a variável tratamento apresentou p <0,20. Nesse sentido, a análise ajustada não foi realizada. Os dentes tratados com HVGIC tiveram 65% menos chance de falha do que aqueles tratados com CHC + HVGIC. Assim, pode-se sugerir que a aplicação de CHC é dispensável em lesões profundas de molares decíduos, visto que a longevidade da restauração é menor e a vitalidade pulpar não se altera com sua utilização.

Pulp vitality of primary molars with deep caries treated with ART restorations: 2-year RCT.

The aim of this study was to compare the pulp vitality of primary teeth with deep caries treated with two restorative techniques. The restoration survival rate was also evaluated as a secondary outcome. Children aged from 4 to 8 years with at least one deep carious lesion in molars were selected at the Ibirapuera University dental clinic. One hundred and eight deciduous molars were allocated into two groups: (1) restoration with calcium hydroxide cement lining followed by filling with high-viscosity glass ionomer cement (CHC+HVGIC) or (2) restoration with HVGIC. Pulp vitality and restoration survival were evaluated at 6, 12, and 24 months. Intent-to-treat analysis was used for pulp vitality, and survival analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier method (α=5%). Results: At 24 months, 86 restorations were evaluated, and 91 were evaluated at least once during the study. There was no significant difference between the restorative treatments regarding pulp vitality (CHC +HVGIC=70% and HVGIC=68.5%) (OR=1.091; CI95%=0.481-2.475). However, HVGIC (73%) restorations showed a higher survival rate than CHC+HVGIC (50%) (p=0.021). Thus, it can conclude that deep caries in primary molars should be restored with HVGIC, since the technique results in similar pulp vitality to the CHC +HVGIC, but with a higher restoration survival rate.

Pulp vitality of primary molars with deep caries treated with ART restorations: 2-year RCT

Abstract: The aim of this study was to compare the pulp vitality of primary teeth with deep caries treated with two restorative techniques. The restoration survival rate was also evaluated as a secondary outcome. Children aged from 4 to 8 years with at least one deep carious lesion in molars were selected at the Ibirapuera University dental clinic. One hundred and eight deciduous molars were allocated into two groups: (1) restoration with calcium hydroxide cement lining followed by filling with high-viscosity glass ionomer cement (CHC+HVGIC) or (2) restoration with HVGIC. Pulp vitality and restoration survival were evaluated at 6, 12, and 24 months. Intent-to-treat analysis was used for pulp vitality, and survival analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier method (α=5%). Results: At 24 months, 86 restorations were evaluated, and 91 were evaluated at least once during the study. There was no significant difference between the restorative treatments regarding pulp vitality (CHC +HVGIC=70% and HVGIC=68.5%) (OR=1.091; CI95%=0.481-2.475). However, HVGIC (73%) restorations showed a higher survival rate than CHC+HVGIC (50%) (p=0.021). Thus, it can conclude that deep caries in primary molars should be restored with HVGIC, since the technique results in similar pulp vitality to the CHC +HVGIC, but with a higher restoration survival rate.

Vitalidade pulpar em lesões de cárie profundas após restaurações pelo Tratamento Restaurador Atraumático (ART) em molares decíduos: resultado após 24 meses de um ensaio clínico randomizado / Pulp vitality in deep carious lesions after Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) restorations in primary molars: 24 months results of a randomized clinical trial

O objetivo desta tese foi avaliar a vitalidade pulpar de dentes decíduos com lesão de cárie profunda tratados com duas técnicas restauradoras. A taxa de sobrevivência da restauração foi avaliada como um desfecho secundário. Este volume apresenta um compilado do protocolo de pesquisa e os resultados de ensaio clínico randomizado (Clinicaltrials.gov registration NCT02903979) de não inferioridade com dois braços paralelos relatados pelas recomendações SPIRIT e CONSORT, respectivamente. Crianças de 4 a 8 anos com pelo menos uma lesão cariosa profunda oclusal ou ocluso-proximal em molares decíduos foram selecionadas na clínica odontológica da Universidade Ibirapuera. Cento e oito molares decíduos foram alocados em dois grupos: (1) restauração com cimento de hidróxido de cálcio seguido do cimento de ionômero de vidro de alta viscosidade (CHC + HVGIC) ou (2) restauração com HVGIC. A vitalidade pulpar e a sobrevivência da restauração foram avaliadas em 6, 12 e 24 meses. A análise por intenção de tratar foi usada para a vitalidade pulpar e a análise de sobrevida foi realizada com o método de Kaplan-Meier ( = 5%). Aos 24 meses, 86 restaurações foram avaliadas e 91 foram avaliadas pelo menos uma vez durante o estudo. A perda foi de 20%, e o número de participantes no início e no final do estudo foi semelhante entre os grupos (p = 0,872). Não houve diferença significativa entre os tratamentos restauradores em relação à vitalidade pulpar (CHC + HVGIC = 70% e HVGIC = 68,5%) (OR = 1,09; IC95% = 0,48-2,48). No entanto, as restaurações HVGIC (73%) apresentaram uma taxa de sobrevivência maior do que CHC + HVGIC (50%) (p = 0,021). Na análise de regressão de Cox apenas a variável tratamento apresentou p <0,20. Nesse sentido, a análise ajustada não foi realizada. Os dentes tratados com HVGIC tiveram 65% menos chance de falha do que aqueles tratados com CHC + HVGIC. Assim, pode-se sugerir que a aplicação de CHC é dispensável em lesões profundas de molares decíduos, visto que a longevidade da restauração é menor e a vitalidade pulpar não se altera com sua utilização.

Management of deep caries lesions with or without pulp involvement in primary teeth: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Abstract: There is a lack of evidence about the best approach for cavitated caries lesions with the possibility of pulpal involvement in primary teeth. Thus, the present authors aimed to verify the best treatment for deep caries lesions with or without pulp involvement in primary teeth. The search was conducted in MEDLINE/Pubmed and Web of Science databases until May 2020. Studies that compared techniques to manage deep caries lesions with at least 12 months of follow-up were included. The risk of bias was evaluated using the RoB tool. Network meta-analysis and pairwise meta-analyses were conducted considering the treatment clinical success as an outcome, according to the pulp health condition. From 491 potentially eligible studies, 9 were included. For deep caries lesions with pulp vitality, the Hall Technique presented the highest probability of success (78%). In the event of accidental pulp exposure, pulpectomy presented a 76% chance of providing the best clinical results. For pulp necrosis, no difference was observed between a pulpectomy and non-instrumented endodontic treatment (RR = 0.69; 95%CI: 0.21-2.33) Thus, it was concluded that the Hall Technique may be a better option for deep caries lesions with pulp vitality. In cases of accidental pulp exposure of vital teeth during caries removal, a pulpectomy may be considered the best option. However, there are insufficient studies to build up evidence about the best treatment option when irreversible pulpitis or pulp necrosis is present.

Management of deep caries lesions with or without pulp involvement in primary teeth: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

There is a lack of evidence about the best approach for cavitated caries lesions with the possibility of pulpal involvement in primary teeth. Thus, the present authors aimed to verify the best treatment for deep caries lesions with or without pulp involvement in primary teeth. The search was conducted in MEDLINE/Pubmed and Web of Science databases until May 2020. Studies that compared techniques to manage deep caries lesions with at least 12 months of follow-up were included. The risk of bias was evaluated using the RoB tool. Network meta-analysis and pairwise meta-analyses were conducted considering the treatment clinical success as an outcome, according to the pulp health condition. From 491 potentially eligible studies, 9 were included. For deep caries lesions with pulp vitality, the Hall Technique presented the highest probability of success (78%). In the event of accidental pulp exposure, pulpectomy presented a 76% chance of providing the best clinical results. For pulp necrosis, no difference was observed between a pulpectomy and non-instrumented endodontic treatment (RR = 0.69; 95%CI: 0.21-2.33) Thus, it was concluded that the Hall Technique may be a better option for deep caries lesions with pulp vitality. In cases of accidental pulp exposure of vital teeth during caries removal, a pulpectomy may be considered the best option. However, there are insufficient studies to build up evidence about the best treatment option when irreversible pulpitis or pulp necrosis is present.